Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Thursday November 20, 2008

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Nuclear Weapons

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Save to My PortfolioStemming Nuclear Proliferation: Prevent and Manage the Rise of New Nuclear Powers

Michael E. O'Hanlon and Stephen P. Cohen, February 28, 2007, Opportunity 08

Stemming Nuclear Proliferation: Prevent and Manage the Rise of New Nuclear PowersNorth Korea has just marked the first anniversary of its nuclear test, calling it a "great miracle." To address this and other threats, Stephen Cohen and Michael O'Hanlon argue that the next President should enhance adherence to international non-proliferation agreements; expand threat reduction efforts; and place less emphasis on the role of nuclear arms in protecting America. Read More

Nuclear Weapons, Weapons of Mass Destruction, Weapons, Arms Control, Proliferation

PAST EVENT

Save to My PortfolioA Plan for Action: Renewed American Leadership and International Cooperation for the 21st Century

Thursday, November 20, 2008
9:00 AM to 11:00 AM
Washington, DC

To face the daunting problems of the global financial crisis to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and transnational threats such as nuclear proliferation, terrorism and global climate change, the new Obama administration will need to forge global partnerships and usher in a new era of international cooperation.  On November 20, the Managing Global Insecurity (MGI) Project released "A Plan for Action,” a comprehensive set of foreign policy recommendations for the next U.S. president—and other world leaders—to address the most critical challenges facing the world today. Read More

Transnational Security Threats, Iraq, Afghanistan, Foreign Policy, Nuclear Weapons

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Save to My PortfolioManaging Global Insecurity: A Plan for Action

Managing Global Insecurity, November 2008, The Brookings Institution

Managing Global Insecurity: A Plan for ActionAmerican and global leaders face a choice: they can either use this moment to help shape an international, rule-based order that will protect their global interests, or resign themselves to an ad hoc international system where they are increasingly powerless to shape the course of international affairs. The longer the delay in new approaches and new cooperation against today’s threats, the more difficult the challenges will become. Global leaders must chart a shared path forward that marries power and responsibility to achieve together what cannot be achieved apart: peace and security in a transnational world. Read More

International Organizations, Transnational Security Threats, Force and Legitimacy, Diplomacy, International Relations

BOOK

Save to My PortfolioRestoring the Balance

Richard N. Haass and Martin S. Indyk, November 01, 2008

Experts propose a new, nonpartisan Middle East strategy drawing on the lessons of past failures to address both the short-term and long-term challenges to U.S. interests. Read More

Middle East, Iran, Iraq, Nuclear Weapons, Foreign Policy

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Save to My PortfolioNorth Korea: Planning for After the Kims

Kongdan Oh, October 29, 2008, International Herald Tribune

North Korea: Planning for After the KimsThere has been much speculation over the declining health of North Korean leader Kim Jong-il in recent weeks. Kongdan Oh writes that it is imperative to prepare for the eventual collapse of the Kim regime and that regime change in North Korea can open the way for an end to the Cold War on the Korean peninsula and build the foundation of a democratic and unified Korea that will influence the region. Read More

North Korea, Northeast Asia, Nuclear Weapons, Asia

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Save to My PortfolioU.S. Policy Toward Iran: Missed Opportunities and Paths Forward

Suzanne Maloney, Summer 2008, The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, Volume 32:2

Suzanne Maloney writes that U.S. policy toward Iran is in a profound state of disarray as international support for sanctions or use of force has dwindled recently. Maloney argues that the U.S. must first understand where the miscalculations occurred, and that the next administration should be prepared to outline a new way forward on Iran. Read More

Iran, Nuclear Weapons, Diplomacy, Middle East, Foreign Policy

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Save to My PortfolioToward a World Without Nuclear Weapons

Ivo H. Daalder and Jan Lodal, November/December 2008, Foreign Affairs

The next president will have an opportunity to make the elimination of all nuclear weapons and organizing principle of U.S. nuclear policy. It will take a real commitment, at the highest levels and beginning with the United States, to turn what Ivo Daalder and Jan Lodal call the “logic of zero” into a practical reality. Read More

Nuclear Weapons, Proliferation, Weapons of Mass Destruction, Weapons, National Security

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Save to My PortfolioIn the U.S., Even Those Against the Nuclear Deal Like India

Stephen P. Cohen, October 13, 2008, livemint.com

In an interview in Delhi around the time the Indo-U.S. nuclear deal cleared its last hurdles in the U.S. Congress and was signed into law by President George Bush last week, Stephen Cohen dwells on the Indo-U.S. nuclear deal, the China context around the deal, and how precarious he thinks the Pakistani democracy is. Read More

India, South Asia, Energy Security, Proliferation, Transnational Security Threats

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Save to My PortfolioThe Next Chapter: The United States and Pakistan

Stephen P. Cohen, September 2008, Pakistan Policy Working Group

The Next Chapter: The United States and PakistanThe bilateral Pakistan Policy Working Group, of which Brookings Senior Fellow Stephen Cohen is a member, issued a new report on the U.S.-Pakistan relationship moving forward. The report recommends commissioning a new National Intelligence Estimate upon which to base U.S. policy. It also advocates greater economic aid, public diplomacy, market access and assistance with counterinsurgency, assuming Pakistan can deliver results against extremism in the tribal areas and adequately oversee its intelligence services. Read More

Pakistan, Transnational Security Threats, Terrorism, Foreign Policy, Diplomacy

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Save to My PortfolioThe Debate on Foreign Policy We Want to Hear

Stephen P. Cohen and Michael E. O'Hanlon, September 26, 2008, Washingtonpost.com

The Washington Post asked a group of foreign affairs analysts and other experts for their take on what the candidates should discuss in the first presidential debate. Brookings Senior Fellows Stephen Cohen and Michael O'Hanlon offered their thoughts. Read More

Foreign Policy, U.S. Politics, Elections, Pakistan, North Korea

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Save to My PortfolioKeeping North Korea in Mind

Michael E. O'Hanlon, September 26, 2008, The Washington Times

Michael O'Hanlon writes that Korea has been the forgotten nuclear crisis, but the presidential candidates need to talk about—and show understanding of—the issues. O'Hanlon believes North Korea should be offered a roadmap to much improved economic and political relations if it gives up nuclear weapons and makes gradual reforms in its conventional military, its economy and its human rights behavior. Read More

North Korea, Nuclear Weapons, Elections, Northeast Asia, Foreign Policy

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Save to My PortfolioDon't Reject the U.S.-India Nuclear Deal

Philip H. Gordon, October 6, 2008 Issue, Newsweek International

Don't Reject the U.S.-India Nuclear DealAs the U.S.-India civil nuclear agreement goes to Congress for approval, Philip Gordon notes the considerable advantages and limited downsides the pact will hold for both countries. He argues that rejection of the deal would only serve to isolate the United States by denying firms the opportunity to participate in partnerships with an emerging strategic partner. Read More

India, International Relations, Energy Security, Proliferation, Nuclear Weapons

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Save to My PortfolioDiplomatic Strategies for Dealing with Iran

Suzanne Maloney, September 2008, Center for a New American Security

Suzanne Maloney writes about diplomatic options for the next administration in dealing with Iran. Maloney offers ideas on how Iran may respond to new U.S. initiatives by exploring previous cases of dialogue, and she concludes by presenting a sense of how Tehran views talking with Washington. Read More

Iran, Diplomacy, Foreign Policy, Nuclear Weapons, International Relations

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Save to My PortfolioWhat Does Russia Want? How Do We Respond?

Steven Pifer, September 11, 2008, George Bush School of Government and Public Service, Texas A&M

What Does Russia Want? How Do We Respond?Steven Pifer spoke before the George Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&M to outline Russia's ambitions in the world, and what the U.S. can do to respond. Pifer believes that U.S. policy must be firm and principled, but it must also treat Russia as more of a partner than a problem going forward. Read More

Russia, International Relations, Diplomacy, Foreign Policy, Europe

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Save to My PortfolioMusharraf’s Departure Is Good for Pakistan but Is It Too Late?

Bruce Riedel, August 18, 2008, The Brookings Institution

Musharraf’s Departure Is Good for Pakistan but Is It Too Late?With the resignation of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, Brookings South Asia expert Bruce Riedel explores the former Pakistani leader's role as a U.S. ally in the fight against Al Qaeda and other extremists. Riedel examines the future of Pakistan without Musharraf at the helm. Read More

Pakistan, Transnational Security Threats, Terrorism, Civil Society, Foreign Policy

In Brief

At least nine nations are believed to have nuclear weapons – the United States, Russia, England, France, China, Pakistan, India, North Korea and Israel. Other nations may have nuclear weapons or are working towards them, most notably Iran. At the height of the Cold War in 1985, there were believed to be 65,000 nuclear weapons in the world. As a result of the Non-Proliferation Treaty and unilateral decisions by some countries, this number has been reduced to about 20,000.

Featured Experts

Ivo H. Daalder

Ivo H. Daalder

Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy

Ivo Daalder, a former director for European Affairs on the National Security Council, is an expert on national security affairs, the use of force, nonproliferation and nuclear weapons, transatlantic relations and the policy-making process.
Read More

Daniel L. Byman

Daniel L. Byman

Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy, Saban Center for Middle East Policy

Dan Byman focuses on counterterrorism and Middle East security. He also directs Georgetown University’s Center for Peace and Security Studies.
Read More

View All Experts »

Advanced Search | Tips

My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now

Related Topics

View All Topics »

Related Initiatives

View All Initiatives »

Q&A with Strobe Talbott

Global Challenges for the Next U.S. President

"The Non-proliferation Treaty is coming apart in a way that could mean that we could have 15, 20 maybe as many as 30 countries with nuclear weapons in another decade. And that means you've got the potential not just for thermo-nuclear war but multiple thermo-nuclear wars..."

View Larger

Spotlight

ExpertMauricio Cárdenas

Mauricio Cárdenas is a senior fellow and director of the Latin American Initiative. Formerly minister of Economic Development and Transportation, and director of National Planning of Colombia, his research focuses on international and development economics. He is also the president of the Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association (LACEA).

Policy CenterEngelberg Center for Health Care Reform

The Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform provides practical solutions to achieve high-quality, innovative, affordable health care with particular emphasis on identifying opportunities on the national, state and local levels.

ExpertDouglas W. Elmendorf

Doug Elmendorf, whose government posts have included the Federal Reserve, Treasury, Council of Economic Advisors, and CBO, focuses his research on macroeconomics and fiscal policy. He is co-editor of the Brookings Papers on Economic Activity and director of The Hamilton Project, which develops proposals for shared growth.

ExpertSarah A. Binder

Sarah Binder is an expert on Congress and legislative politics.  She is completing a project on the politics of advice and consent, and is at work on the politics of how Congress responds to financial crises.

ExpertJulia B. Isaacs

Julia Isaacs focuses on public investments in children and how children are affected by national budgetary policies. A former federal budget analyst, she also researches the economic mobility of children and families across the income spectrum.

Research ProjectLatin America Initiative

The Latin America Initiative provides high-quality, in-depth, and independent research across a range of economic and political issues, and offers policy recommendations aimed at U.S. and Latin American policymakers.

ExpertSuzanne Maloney

Suzanne Maloney studies Iran, the political economy of the Persian Gulf and Middle East energy policy. A former U.S. State Department policy advisor, she has also counseled private companies on Middle East issues.

Research ProjectThe Hamilton Project

The Hamilton Project produces research and policy proposals on how to create a growing economy that benefits more Americans. Their agenda also focuses on enhancing individual economic security and effective public investments. 

ExpertCarlos Pascual

Carlos Pascual is a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. As vice president and director of Foreign Policy, he focuses on post-conflict stabilization and international security policy.

TOPICThe Presidential Transition

During the 77 days from the election to the Inauguration, Brookings experts will offer 12 "Memos to the President" on top policy priorities across the spectrum of domestic and global challenges, plus additional advice on transitioning from campaigning to governing.

ExpertMark B. McClellan

A medical doctor and economist, Mark McClellan works on promoting high-quality, innovative and affordable health care. Once commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration and administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Dr. McClellan now directs the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform.

ExpertEswar Prasad

Eswar Prasad, the Tolani Senior Professor of Trade Policy at Cornell University, is a senior fellow in Global Economy and Development. He was previously head of the Financial Studies Division and the China Division at the IMF.

ExpertRebecca Blank

Rebecca Blank is an expert on the interaction between the macroeconomy, government anti-poverty programs, and the behavior and well being of low-income families. She has just been named the Robert S. Kerr senior fellow at Brookings.

ExpertHugh B. Price

Former president and chief executive officer of the National Urban League, Hugh Price is an expert on education, civil rights, equal opportunity and criminal justice. His 40-year career spans journalism, philanthropy, the law, and social advocacy.

ExpertDarrell M. West

Darrell M. West is the vice president and director of Governance Studies at Brookings. His studies include campaigns and elections, political advertising, mass media, public opinion, technology policy and electronic government.

ProgramGovernance Studies

Governance Studies explores political institutions of the United States and other democracies to assess how they govern, how their practices compare and how citizens and public servants can advance sound governance.